Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
- NEWS
- Navy hiring 1,500 for civilian jobs 2 hours & 56 minutes ago
- Weekend events put spotlight on pet adoption 1 hour & 7 minutes ago
- How $3 million gets you home on sand 3 hours & 2 minutes ago
- Fresh-mex eatery giving away free taquitos 3 hours ago
- SPORTS
- BUSINESS
- ENTERTAINMENT
- LIFE
- TRAVEL
- OPINION
Angels’ brisket sandwich vs. the Dodger Dog
September 3rd, 2008, 9:59 am · 6 Comments · posted by TODD HARMONSON, OCREGISTER.COM
So the New York Times is raving about the brisket sandwich at Angel Stadium and dissing the Dodger Dog. Of course, East Coast folks seem to think White Castle can’t be topped and have no idea about In-N-Out (double meat, ketchup, mustard and pickles … mmmm).
But back to the ballpark.
Does the New York Times know what it’s writing about? And, no, we don’t mean regarding politics.
What's better: Angel Stadium brisket sandwich or the Dodger Dog?
ADVERTISEMENT
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
-
ADVERTISEMENT
-
ADVERTISEMENT
Angel anything over Dodger anything.
APPLES AND ORANGES! CAN’T COMPARE
Its worth the extra dollars to get the Brisket, its priceless not having to go to LA and Dodger Stadium.
They’re both a total ripoff.
But having to choose the dog is junk
Eating a NAPKIN at Dodger stadium would be better than Angels health dept violating food. Did we forget? NEVER EAT AT ANGEL STADIUM!
This poll is just silly. Nobody is going to remember the joy of eating a brisket sandwich at the ballpark 20 years after the fact. The hot dog is THE food of baseball, and none is a better or a more memorable eating experience than the Farmer John Dodger Dog.
As to Dodger Stadium versus whatever they call the stadium in Los Ange … oops I meant Anaheim, Dodger stadium is a traditional baseball heaven in a league with Fenway and Wrigley. Angel stadium is — in its current incarnation — a middle-of-the pack stadium at best.